Leverguns: Getting the Job Done Since 1860

Recently, I sent out a flier for a Lever Action Patrol Rifle course that I am teaching in March of 2013. I received a response from an officer who was appalled that I would teach such a course. In fact, he stated that in doing so, officers might actually take it as an endorsement from me that the lever action platform was worthy of use as a patrol rifle.

My response: I am endorsing the lever action platform as being worthy of use as a patrol rifle.

The lever action platform has been a viable personal defense platform since it came onto the scene in 1860 in the form of the Henry Rifle, and the Henry was itself a reworking for the Volcanic Repeating Rifle. Confederate soldiers facing the Henry Rifle in battle called it “that damned Yankee rifle that you load on Sunday and shoot all week”. Note: The above is not a slight to the Spencer Rifle and others of the same era, rather it is in homage to the direct lineage of the platform as we know it today.

The trend towards the use of patrol rifles was jump started by the North Hollywood Bank Robbery in which two gunmen clad in body armor engaged officers from the Los Angeles Police Department in gunfight lasting for over 40 minutes. The LAPD officers were armed with pistols and shotguns, and their rounds could not penetrate the body armor worn by the bandits. Eventually, officers went to a nearby gun shop where the owner provided AR 15 rifles, and LAPD SWAT officers arrived on scene and ended the battle. I doubt that any of those officers on scene that day would have turned away a Marlin 336 as being unworthy.

Several years ago, a friend of mine was on patrol as a Deputy Sheriff in a rural, northeast Georgia County. He ended up in a protracted gunfight in which the bad guy had a rifle while my friend had his duty pistol and a shotgun. I doubt that he would have turned away a Winchester 94 as unworthy had someone happened upon him and offered it to him.  (Note: Since I originally published this piece, I have spoken with the above Deputy, and he assures me that he would have very much welcomed a levergun had one been available to him.)

I am not making an argument that more modern options such as the AR platform be completely abandoned in favor of the levergun. I am simply making an argument that the lever action rifle remains an effective option for use as a patrol or personal protection rifle. In fact, there are some areas in which I believe the levergun offers some advantages.

The biggest advantage that a lever action rifle offers in the firearms market at the time of the writing of this article is availability. The talk of gun control legislation has resulted in a shortage of AR platform and other similar rifles. In the past few weeks I have ventured to out to as many shops I could get to, and the only AR platform rifles I could find still in stock were all class III rifles requiring extensive paperwork and an approval process that is measured in months. However, in several shops I have been able to find leverguns readily available for prices as low as $250.

To go along with this from both an individual peace officer and agency administrator standpoint, the price point makes a fine old levergun an attractive option to perform this function. That trusty deer rifle can do double duty, and an agency that might not be able to afford outfitting all of its personnel with AR platform rifles could more readily purchase leverguns.

Another advantage of the traditional levergun is that it fires heavier bullets than most of the modern semi-auto platforms commonly used as patrol rifles. So as not to overly-bore those readers who for some reason don’t spend their free time studying ballistic performance, what this translates to is that the rounds typically pack more punch and more readily penetrate barriers. This factor comes into play in such instances when a peace officer might have to shoot through a vehicle body or windshield to end a violent confrontation. I have personally witnessed standard .223 ammo (standard AR platform ammo) disintegrate when going through such barriers, but considering a standard .30-30 rifle will be hurling a projectile three times the weight of a standard .223 round this issue is substantially alleviated.

While on the subject of ammunition, I would be remiss if I did not point out that leverguns are also available in several popular pistol calibers such as .357 Magnum and .44 Magnum. While such rounds do not have the range of a rifle round, common loads in each can achieve notable penetration, and considering the elements and range predominant in the proverbial “average gunfight” the effective range such firearms is up to the task.

One should also not discount the inherent reliability of the lever action platform. One need not worry about gas systems or magazines. Simply work the lever and keep going whilst shoving rounds into the tube or action as needed.

Nothing in the above should be taken as an argument for the wholesale adopting of leverguns in place of other platforms. Also, I most certainly am not making an argument concerning what one needs other than that I steadfastly believe that each and every peace officer should go on duty with a rifle at hand. This is about expanding capability, and a rifle is more efficient at ending a violent encounter than is a pistol.

***Note: The above was written with a law enforcement audience in mind. I also wholeheartedly endorse and advocate the use of the lever action platform as a personal defense rifle. This endorsement is not to be construed as an argument that citizens should be unconstitutionally restricted from owning self-loading rifles or unconstitutionally restricted in the ammunition capacity of their rifles.

Lever Action Patrol Rifle course flier

9 comments

  1. You disappointed me… I saw no mention of the .45-70 in there, which would have ended that famous Hollywood gunfight fairly quickly.

    Our former Chief of Police here, now retired, told me about the time earlier in his career when he got shot with a .45-70 while serving a high risk warrant. The 405gr slug, and we may as well call it that, bent his steel ballistic plate into a “V” and in spite of the Level III armor he was out with broken ribs for a while.

    Heck, a .45-70 hurts even on the SENDING end. 😉

    1. Perhaps I can earn forgiveness by telling you that I have approved one of our lieutenants to carry a Marlin 1895 in .45-70.

      The .45-70 isn’t that common here in the South. A levergun around here is invariably a .30-30 with a few .35 Remingtons sneaking in along with a few pistol caliber carbines.

  2. As a long time levergun fan, I’d love to take this class, but unfortunately you’re a long ways from Colorado. Very well written and you’re right, too many dismiss the old levergun and will want the next best tactical toy. You are spot on that the 30-30 and 35 Rem bring a lot more to the fight than the 5.56. Nothing wrong with my AR’s, but I agree that many in Law Enforcement overlook the value of a levergun carbine.

    Lt Col Brian Baldwin
    Colorado Mounted Rangers

  3. A lever-action is genius. Beyond ammo availability, superior ballistics and whatnot it does not put off the public. Look at any movie, the guy with the leverguns always the good guy.

    It gives more options in a police situation, as I never saw a Henry jam…

    I’ve noticed a trend in some want to look like soldiers today, in hair and weaponry. It’s a bad trend that I blame video games on. Again great article. What modern guns do you endorse?

    I only ask because most seem made overseas today.

    1. Bob,

      I don’t turn my nose up at the modern stuff as I also shoot the AR platform as well as Glocks and M&Ps (use both pistols for IDPA matches), and I recently made master in GSSF. I simply believe that a levergun still is viable and, in some instances, preferred. I also very much like vintage S&W revolvers.

  4. I like leverguns. Compared to an AR-15 these offer lower purchase and maintenance cost, better terminal ballistics (ie more power) than .223, increased reliability, simpler manual of arms (less training necessary to run and maintain the gun), no need for detachable magazines, and no “evil black rifle” look (the police ought to be peace-keepers, not soldiers).

    Since with practice you can cycle a levergun during the recoil phase of the shot, and since after recoil you need to re-aim the gun anyway, the manual action doesn’t significantly limit aimed rate of fire compared to a similar weight/similar caliber semi-auto platform.

    IMO, only real disadvantage here is lower capacity, though realistically 6+1 is still not bad, and unlike an AR-15 you can top off a levergun tubular magazine with new rounds at will. (IE, fire one, load one; fire two, load two, etc) partially offsetting the decreased capacity.

    All that said, I just don’t think these are going to add much for most departments. If you take the already standard issue police pump shotgun, put rifle sights on it and load it with slugs, you’ll have a similar or even potentially higher capacity longarm that can reach out to 100 yards, nearly the same working distance as a 30/30 carbine. Admittedly, the rifle is potentially more accurate, but that assumes that the user is capable of taking advantage of the increased accuracy (something that in my experience isn’t true of most peace officers), and the practical difference at under 100 yards probably doesn’t amount to much.

    The pump shotgun isn’t as elegant or easy-handling as a lever-action carbine, but added acquisition, training, and maintenance costs here are effectively zero. Police already have these, and most already are familiar with using them. You can “top off” a shotgun in use just like a carbine. . .no advantage there, and if anything, extended magazine combat shotguns offer higher capacity than rifle-caliber leverguns. 12 gauge can also run buckshot, slugs, beanbag/baton rounds, and other specialty rounds. Small pellet shot is available to limit overpenetration indoors or in crowded areas, another potential advantage to shotguns.

    In terms of power, a standard 12 gauge slug at 100 yards retains over 900 ft-lbs of energy. That’s not as much as a 30/30 at that distance, but its still considerably more than any standard issue police handgun (including 40SW or 357 magnum) at the muzzle, plus the large slug caliber (0.70″) and 1 ounce weight provide a tremendous amount of “power factor” (ie momentum) making the terminal effect better than the kinetic energy number alone suggests.

    Bottom line, the old 12 gauge can do must of what you’d need to do with a 30/30, a lot more, and is already in the hands of most police.

  5. I recall reading about a patrolman somewhere who carried some variety of levergun as his patrol rifle. Once he was called as backup because someone had barricaded himself in an alley behind some dumpsters, and the other cops’ pistols and rifles could not penetrate the dumpster. The patrolman with the levergun arrived and put a slug through one of the dumpsters, which prompted the criminal to surrender, as my Aunt liked to say, “toot sweet” (and yes, she spelled it that way, too).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s